A yankee at the court of King Arthur

Preface 

The ungentle laws and customs touched upon in this tale are historical, and the episodes which are used to illustrate them are also historical. It is not pretended that these laws and customs existed in England in the sixth century; no, it is only pretended that inasmuch as they existed in the English and other civilisations of far later times, it is safe to consider that it is no libel upon the sixth century to suppose them to have been in practice in that day also.

One is quite justified in inferring that wherever one of these laws and customs was lacking in that remote time, its place was competently filled by a worse one.

Page 77
Why, dear me, any kind of royalty, howsoever modified, any kind of aristocracy, howsoever pruned, is rightly an insult; but if you are born and brought up under that sort of arrangement you probably never find it out for yourself, and don’t believe it when somebody else tells you. It is enough to make a body ashamed of his race to think of the sort of froth that has always occupied its thrones without shadow of right or reason, and the seventh-rate people that have always figured as its aristocracies—a company of monarchs and nobles who, as a rule, would have achieved only poverty and obscurity if left, like their betters, to their own exertions.

Page 78
Inherited ideas are a curious thing, and interesting to observe and examine. I had mine, the King and his people had theirs. In both cases they flowed in ruts worn deep by time and habit, and the man who should have proposed to divert them by reason and argument would have had a long contract on his hands. For instance, those people had inherited the idea that all men without title and a long pedigree, whether they had great natural gifts and acquirements or hadn’t, were creatures of no more consideration than so many animals, bugs, insects; whereas I had inherited the idea that human daws who can consent to masquerade in the peacock-shams of inherited dignities and unearned titles, are of no good but to be laughed at. The way I was looked upon was odd, but it was natural. You know how the keeper and the public regard the elephant in the menagerie: well, that is the idea. They are full of admiration of his vast bulk and his prodigious strength; they speak with pride of the fact that he can do a hundred marvels which are far and away beyond their own powers; and they speak with the same pride of the fact that in his wrath he is able to drive a thousand men before him. But does that make him one of them?

No; the raggedest tramp in the pit would smile at the idea. He couldn’t comprehend it; couldn’t take it in; couldn’t in any remote way conceive of it. Well, to the King, the nobles, and all the nation, down to the very slaves and tramps, I was just that kind of an elaphant, and nothing more I was admired, also feared; but it was as an animal is admired and feared. The animal is not reverenced, neither was I; I was not even respected. I had no pedigree, no inherited title; so in the King’s and the nobles‘ eyes I was mere dirt; the people regarded me with wonder and awe, but there was no reverence mixed with it; through the force of inherited ideas they were not able to conceive of anytling being entitled to that, except pedigree and lordship. There you see the hand of that awful power, the Roman Catholic Church. In two or three little centuries it had converted a nation of men to a nation of worms.

Before the day of the Church’s supremacy in the world, men were men, and held their heads up, and had a man’s pride and spirit and independence; and what of greatness and position a person got, he got mainly by achievement, not by birth. But then the Church came to the front, with an axe to grind; and she was wise, subtle, and knew more than one way to skin a cat—or a nation; she invented ‚ divine right of Kings,‘ and propped it all around, brick by brick, with the Beatitudes—wrenching them from their good purpose to make them fortify an evil one; she preached (to the commoner) humility, obedience to superiors, the beauty of self-sacrifice; she preached (to the commoner) meekness under insult; preached (still to the commoner, always to the commoner) patience, meanness of spirit, non-resistance under oppression; and she introduced heritable ranks and aristocracies, and taught all the Christian populations of the earth to bow down to them and worship them. Even down to my birth-century that poison was still in the blood of Christendom, and the best of English commoners was still content to see his inferiors impudently continuing to hold a number of positions, such as lordships and the throne, to which the grotesque laws of his country did not allow him to aspire; in fact, he was not merely contented with this strange condition of things, he was even. able to persuade himself that he was proud of it. It seems to show that there isn’t anything you can’t stand, if you are only born and bred to it.

A YANKEE AT THE COURT OF KING ARTHUR by Mark Twain
(Samuel L. Clemens)
Copyright © 1905, London, Chatto & Windus

It doesn’t occur his mind

Indeed he is in great fear, not knowing what mighty one may suddenly appear, wielding the Ring, and assailing him with war, seeking to cast him down and take his place. That we should wish to cast him down and have no one in his place is not a thought that occurs to his mind.

JRR Tolkien: The Lord of the Rings, ISBN 0 261 10243 5

Caxtons Vorrede (1485)

Nachdem ich verschiedene Geschichten, sowohl der Betrachtung wie anderer geschichtlicher und weltlicher Taten großer Eroberer und Fürsten, und desgleichen gewisse Bücher der der Exempel und der Lehre vollbracht und beendigt hatte, kamen viele edle und mannigfaltige Herren dieses Reiches England und fragten mich vielmals und oft, warum ich die edle Geschichte des heiligen Grals und des berühmtesten christlichen Königs, des ersten und obersten der drei besten christlichen und ruhmvollen, des Königs Arthur, nicht veranstaltet und gedruckt habe, der unter uns englischen männern am meisten und vor allen anderen christlichen Königen in Andenken gehalten werden sollte.

Denn es ist ja in der ganzen Welt allgemein bekannt, daß es neun ruhmvolle Könige gibt, welche die besten sind, die je waren. Nämlich drei Heiden, drei Juden und drei Christenmänner.

Was die Heiden angeht, so waren sie vor der Fleischwerdung Christi, welche genannt waren: der erste Hektor von Troja, dessen Geschichte sowohl in Ballade wie Prosa auf uns gekommen ist, der zweite Alexander der Große, und der dritte Julius Cäsar, Kaiser von Rom, von dem die Geschichten wohlbekannt und zu haben sind. Und was die drei Juden angeht, die ebenfalls vor der Fleischwerdung unseres Herrn waren, von denen war der erste Herzog Josua, der die Kinder Israels in das Land der Verheißung gebracht hatte, der zweite David, König von Jerusalem, und der dritte Judas Makkabäus: von diesen dreien berichtet die Bibel all ihre edlen Geschichten und Taten. Und seit der besagten Fleischwerdung sind drei edle Christenmänner in der ganzen Welt in die Zahl der neun besten und ruhmvollsten eingestellt und zugelassen worden, von denen der erste der edle Arthur war, dessen edle Taten ich in diesem gegenwärtigem Buch, das hier folgt, zu beschreiben vorhabe. Der zweite war Charlemagne oder Karl der Große, dessen Geschichte sowohl französisch wie englisch an vielen Orten zu haben ist. Und der dritte und letzte war Gottfried von Bouillon, von dessen Taten und Leben ich für den trefflichen Fürsten und König edlen Angedenkens, König Eduard den Vierten, ein Buch machte.

DER TOD ARTHURSSIR THOMAS MALORY – ERSTER BAND – IM INSEL-VERLAG ZU LEIPZIG – 1913